BC afrexai-observability-engine
Complete observability & reliability engineering system. Use when designing monitoring, implementing structured logging, setting up distributed tracing, building alerting systems, creating SLO/SLI frameworks, running incident response, conducting post-mortems, or auditing system reliability. Covers all three pillars (logs/metrics/traces), alert design, dashboard architecture, on-call operations, chaos engineering, and cost optimization.
As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 11347 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 15 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 11347 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 39 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 17 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 440: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 74 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (33 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.