SKILLEMALL.ai

BB gridtrx

Double-entry, full-cycle accounting suite built for AI agents. Converts bank CSVs, OFX, and QBO files into balanced, auditable books — balance sheet, income statement, general ledger, trial balance. All data stays in a single local SQLite file.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Cware v0.2.0 MIT-0 46 files body ≈ 5 313 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentsFinancetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
61
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 46. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5313 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires_tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 30Running it twice. 20 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5313 tokens
  • 100Steps. 58 steps
  • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
  • 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 244: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 58 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This bookkeeping skill is purpose-built for accounting, but it needs Review because it claims local-only processing while one import path can send financial documents to Anthropic and some file/export actions are broader than the stated workspace boundary.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 27 Aug 2026