AC quantum-circuit-builder-with-proof
Quantum Circuit Builder with Proof: Use this product when a quantum circuit needs verifiable evidence, not just. Use when an agent needs quantum circuit builder with proof, formally verified quantum circuit design, proof carrying quantum circuit certificates (qpcert), independent verification of a quantum proof certificate from another party, audit ready quantum computing artifacts for research and compliance, certify circuit, circuit, claims through AgentPMT-hosted remote tool calls.
Quantum Circuit Builder with Proof: Use this product when a quantum circuit needs verifiable evidence, not just.
As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, execution cost, running it twice
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 10806 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Execution cost. Instruction body is 10806 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 90 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 489: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 24 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 90 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (23 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.