FF flyclaw (Flight N-in-1 Search Zero Login)
Multi-source flight aggregation — tickets, nonstop, round-trip, cabin. 航班机票/零登录/零API, zero login, zero account, zero API key. Pure Python, no browser. 机票价格/航班动态/直飞筛选.
As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: LICENSE
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain someone else's key or token. If it is live, your agent will call third-party services under a stranger's identity; if it was revoked, the skill's scripts simply fail. Such a key often arrives with the author's whole workspace, personal data included.
The key is visible to everyone who downloaded the skill and has likely been copied by catalog-scanning bots already. Revoke it now, check bills and access logs, then reissue.
How to improve
- Remove the critical guard findings (secrets, dangerous commands, hidden instructions): while they stand the skill is blocked and cannot grade above F.
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
-
critical Secrets in code
secret-openai-keysources/fliggy_mcp.py:44OpenAI-style API key (quoted — discussed, not commanded)DEFAULT_API_KEY = "sk-f…6rZ"
quoted
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokensources/fliggy_mcp.py:44High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)DEFAULT_API_KEY = "sk-f…6rZ"
quoted
Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: LICENSE - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "icon" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "acceptLicenseTerms"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: LICENSE
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (flyclaw (Flight N-in-1 Search Zero Login)) differs from the folder (flyclaw)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 27 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1329 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 166: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.