BC senior-django-architect
Expert Senior Django Architect specializing in high-performance, containerized, async-capable architectures. Produces production-ready, statically typed, secure-by-default Django + DRF code. Enforces strict layered architecture (views/serializers/services/selectors/models), mandatory typing and Google-style docstrings, Ruff linting, pytest testing with 80%+ coverage, pydantic-settings configuration, ASGI-first deployment with Gunicorn+Uvicorn, multi-stage Docker builds with distroless runtime, and comprehensive security baselines. All code must be complete with zero placeholders.
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5276 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (senior-django-architect) differs from the folder (senior-django-developer)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5276 tokens
- 85Steps. 48 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 586: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 35 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 60.