SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AF review-skill-improver

Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills. Use when you have accumulated feedback data and want to improve review accuracy.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kevin Anderson v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 581 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 12 h ago

Analyzes feedback logs to identify patterns and suggest improvements to review skills.

As a process F 48/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../review-feedback-schema/SKILL.md

AnalyzerData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
48/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../review-feedback-schema/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../review-feedback-schema/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../review-feedback-schema/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../review-feedback-schema/SKILL.md
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 17 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1581 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 167: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a markdown-only review aid that analyzes feedback logs and suggests evidence-based improvements without hidden execution, persistence, or credential use.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 3 Jun 2026