SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BF rust-testing-code-review

Reviews Rust test code for unit test patterns, integration test structure, async testing, mocking approaches, and property-based testing. Covers Rust 2024 edition changes including async fn in traits for mocks,

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Kevin Anderson v1.0.5 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 3 452 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 56/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
56/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../review-verification-protocol/SKILL.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 112 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3452 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 210: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 112 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a markdown-only Rust test review skill whose instructions are coherent with its stated purpose and do not show hidden or unsafe behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 1 Jun 2026