SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC querying-aws-s3

Queries S3 object metadata, tracks bucket activity, audits object changes, searches annotations, and analyzes storage metrics using S3 Metadata system tables (journal, inventory, annotation) and S3 Storage Lens tables via Athena SQL. Applies when counting objects, finding recent uploads or deletions, identifying who wrote to a prefix, breaking down storage classes, finding objects by tag, searching annotation content, analyzing storage lens metrics, or enabling S3 Metadata tracking. Prefers system tables over raw S3 APIs (list-objects-v2, head-object) at scale. Trigger phrases: bucket activity, object count, who uploaded, track deletions, storage class breakdown, find by tag, search annotations, storage lens metrics, audit bucket changes.

ClawHub Claude Code author: Amazon Web Services 1 file body ≈ 3 067 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 22 h ago

Queries S3 object metadata, tracks bucket activity, audits object changes, searches annotations, and analyzes storage metrics using S3 Metadata system tables…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAWSData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3067 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 748: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 17 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.