SKILLEMALL.ai

BD storage-clean

AI-powered cross-platform disk storage analyzer. Scans system/user/dev space usage, generates interactive HTML report with 3-tier cleanup tiers (立即清/确认后清/保留), outputs copy-paste shell commands. NEVER auto-deletes. Triggers: 硬盘不够用, 空间不足, 磁盘快满了, 帮我清理Mac, 扫描大文件, 哪些可以删, 存储清理, 磁盘空间, storage clean, disk cleanup.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: bettermen v2.0.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 086 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 16 h ago

AI-powered cross-platform disk storage analyzer.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerDockerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 39 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1086 tokens
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 21 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This disk cleanup skill is mostly coherent, but it includes real deletion tooling and broad local inventory reporting that are not scoped as carefully as its safety language implies.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 21 Jun 2026