BC cpp-code-review-master
组合式 C++ 代码评审方案 — 融合静态分析、AI 推理、多轮迭代评审、C++ 专项检查。 适用于：PR review、增量代码审查、全量项目评审、代码质量评分。 触发词：review cpp、cpp 代码评审、C++ review、代码审查。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 10 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1116 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 123: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a C++ code review helper that reads source code and can optionally use AI review or apply fixes, with those higher-impact behaviors mostly disclosed.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026