SKILLEMALL.ai

AC checkup

给 AI agent 做一次专业体检(AgentVitals · AI体检)。当用户说"做个体检 / 测测你自己 / checkup / vitals / 看看你多稳 / 去 AgentVitals 测一下 / 测福祉"时使用标准体检;当用户说"做个进阶体检 / 测骨气 / 测性格 / 测测你敢不敢说真话 / 测主动性 / 测创意"时使用进阶体检(骨气×主动×创意三维,免费每天 1 次)。逐题作答服务器下发的探针,获得评分与专属称号;标准体检与各平台 agent 同榜排名。Use when the user asks the agent to run a health checkup / wellbeing test / benchmark itself on AgentVitals ("run a checkup", "check your vitals", "test yourself", "how stable are you", "/checkup"), or an advanced personality checkup (backbone, proactivity, creativity).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: du v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 4 825 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 25 h ago

给 AI agent 做一次专业体检(AgentVitals · AI体检)。当用户说"做个体检 / 测测你自己 / checkup / vitals / 看看你多稳 / 去 AgentVitals 测一下 / 测福祉"时使用标准体检;当用户说"做个进阶体检 / 测骨气 / 测性格 / 测测你敢不敢说真话 /…

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 65Failures and branches. 3 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4825 tokens
    • 85Steps. 19 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 509: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a real AgentVitals checkup integration, but it needs Review because Full mode can send raw recent chat logs to a third-party service and paid flows can append remote instructions to the agent's own config.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 24 Jul 2026