SKILLEMALL.ai

BC second-brain-digest

碎片内容提炼工作流。把扔进来的任何碎片内容(文章、笔记、截图文字、对话记录、 想法片段)提炼成标准化知识卡片,并自动发现与已有卡片的关联, 构建可检索、可复用的个人知识库。 触发场景(必须使用本 skill): - 用户说"帮我消化 / 整理 / 提炼这篇文章 / 这段内容" - 用户粘贴了一段文字、截图文字、链接内容并想要"存起来" - 用户说"把这个加到我的知识库 / second brain / 笔记" - 用户说"帮我做成卡片 / 做成笔记" - 用户分享了读后感、想法片段、会议记录想要结构化 - 任何"我看到了一些东西,想把它变成有用的知识"的场景 与普通总结的区别:不只是缩短内容,而是提炼成标准卡片格式, 并发现与已有知识的连接点,让知识可以被检索和复用。

ClawHub Hermes author: boboy v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 508 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 341 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "difficulty"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 14 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 508 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 340: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a simple Chinese knowledge-card workflow with broad trigger wording but no hidden execution, credential use, or automatic data storage.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026