AB goofish-item-detail
Extracts full detail data from a single Goofish (闲鱼/xianyu, goofish.com) second-hand item page. Input: item URL or item ID. Output: title, price, seller info (name, labels), full description, image gallery, item tags/attributes, want-count. Use when user mentions goofish item detail, 闲鱼商品详情, xianyu item page, 二手商品详情, get goofish product info, 采集闲鱼单品数据, 抓取闲鱼商品, scrape goofish item, xianyu product detail, 获取闲鱼卖家信息, seller info goofish, item description goofish, 闲鱼详情页, 想要人数, 闲鱼图片. Also applies to: verifying a specific listing before purchase, extracting seller contact/rating information, bulk item detail enrichment from a list of item IDs.
Extracts full detail data from a single Goofish (闲鱼/xianyu, goofish.com) second-hand item page. Input: item URL or item ID. Output: title, price, seller info…
As a process B 69/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 69/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 18 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1371 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 644: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.