SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BC aice

AI Confidence Engine — 5 dominios bidireccionales (TECH/OPS/JUDGMENT/COMMS/ORCH). Agent + User scoring. Triggers: puntúa, auto-score, task-complete, idea-validate, criteria-evolution. Pool scoring por runtime.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: brugillo v1.2.1 11 files body ≈ 3 323 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 20 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3323 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -240 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 209: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears to be a legitimate confidence-scoring tool, but it needs Review because it persists behavioral profiles, can sync data externally, and contains overbroad or contradictory instructions.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026