SKILLEMALL.ai

BD ssgep-single-sample-expression

单样本无重复表达谱技能(SSGEP — Single Sample Gene Expression Profile)。植物/梨属等转录组表达谱分析全流程:原始数据获取→质控定量→差异与GO/KEGG富集→WGCNA共表达→SNP遗传分化→600DPI出图→论文三格式(HTML/DOCX/PPTX)+Shiny交互。**明确支持两种模式**:模式A 单样本无生物学重复(每个条件仅1样本,用固定离散度0.1+折叠变化法);模式B 有生物学重复(标准DESeq2/edgeR离散度估计+设计公式)。当用户要做RNA-seq表达谱、差异基因(DEG)、WGCNA、功能基因挖掘,或要求"出论文三格式/做表达谱分析/打包项目案例"时调用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: BSK-Drs v1.0.1 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 918 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 35 h ago

单样本无重复表达谱技能(SSGEP — Single Sample Gene Expression…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureWordPowerPointSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 69 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1918 tokens
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 316: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a transparent bioinformatics workflow skill whose broad triggers and command permissions deserve caution, but its behavior is disclosed and aligned with RNA-seq analysis.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Aug 2026