AC clay-to-cargo
Rebuild a Clay table on Cargo, powered by Cargo — map every Clay enrichment column to its provider action, price the run before it happens, and keep the result as version-controlled code instead of a spreadsheet. Triggers: "migrate from Clay", "move my Clay table to Cargo", "Clay alternative", "replace Clay", "I have a Clay export", "what does Clay's enrichment column map to", "my Clay bill is too high", "Clay but as code". Migration, mapping, parity, spreadsheet, declarative. Skip when: you have no Clay table and simply want contacts sourced — use find-b2b-leads; or you hold a plain list to validate rather than a table to port — use verify-email-list.
Rebuild a Clay table on Cargo, powered by Cargo — map every Clay enrichment column to its provider action, price the run before it happens, and keep the…
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3112 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 8 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 660: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.