SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BD category-selection

亚马逊品类自动化选品分析技能。通过五维评分模型对亚马逊品类进行深度市场调研，生成Markdown分析报告。当用户使用 /category-selection 命令或提出'分析XX品类'、'XX品类市场调研'、'XX品类选品'等需求时触发此技能。支持配置分析数量，默认Top20。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ChanaLii v1.0.0 MIT-0 26 files body ≈ 2 886 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token scripts/parse_category_report.py:52
    High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)
    (r'\\u002…are\\u0022:\\u0022?([\d.]+%?)\\u0022?', 'Amazon自营占比'),
    detector

Files scanned: 26. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 55 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2886 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -37 of 17 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 139: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 37 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 55 items
  • +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a legitimate market-analysis skill, but it needs review because it automatically uses local Sorftime API credentials and sends them in URL-based external requests.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026