BB Swelist — Tech Internship & Job Tracker
Helps you find tech internships and new-grad jobs, track every application locally, and prep for interviews — no sign-up needed
As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 127 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "repository" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "keywords"
Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Swelist — Tech Internship & Job Tracker) differs from the folder (swelist)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4850 tokens
- 100Steps. 96 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 26 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 127: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 42 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 96 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (26 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches its job-search purpose, but it asks agents to read a local profile file and handles resume/application data with unclear consent and persistence boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Sept 2026