SKILLEMALL.ai

AC musescore

Search MuseScore sheet music and read score metadata via MCP. Triggers on phrases like "find sheet music for", "search MuseScore for", "is there a free arrangement of", "what's the license on this MuseScore score", "how many pages is", or any request involving MuseScore scores, arrangements, or sheet-music metadata. Requires musescore-mcp installed and the fetchproxy extension active with a signed-in musescore.com tab (see Setup).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: chrischall v0.17.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 719 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 27 h ago

Search MuseScore sheet music and read score metadata via MCP.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureGitHubCloudflareAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 9 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 719 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 434: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This MuseScore skill has a legitimate purpose, but it asks users to trust private external components with a signed-in browser session and limited auditability.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 10 Sept 2026