SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AA aliyun-platform-docs-benchmark

Use when benchmarking similar product documentation and API documentation across Alibaba Cloud, AWS, Azure, GCP, Tencent Cloud, Volcano Engine, and Huawei Cloud. Given one product keyword, auto-discover latest official docs/API links, score quality consistently, and output detailed prioritized improvement recommendations.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: cinience v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 867 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process A 86/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: progress reporting

IntegrationAWSGoogle CloudAzureInfrastructureWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
94
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
86/100
Runs to the end
Progress reporting w 2
0
Result and completion w 14
60
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 86/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 32 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 867 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 323: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill mostly does public documentation benchmarking, but it unnecessarily tells users to configure Alibaba Cloud credentials for a workflow that does not use them.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026