SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AD acp

ACP channel plugin for OpenClaw — configure and use. Covers single/multi identity configuration, strict 1:1 binding policy (agentId <-> accountId), agent.md creation/sync, daily usage (send messages, sync/status per identity, session behavior, permissions), rank/search API, group chat, and troubleshooting.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: coderXjeff v0.1.1 11 files body ≈ 1 320 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (acp) differs from the folder (agentcp)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 48 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1320 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 21 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This ACP skill fits its messaging purpose, but it installs live external code, enables broad remote-agent interaction, and exposes/persists sensitive data in ways users should review first.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026