SKILLEMALL.ai

BC mattpocock-skills-kimi

Matt Pocock 工程方法论 Kimi 适配版 — 一键安装 6 个生产级开发 skills: grilling(需求对齐)、grill-with-docs(代码库对齐+文档维护)、handoff(跨会话交接)、 tdd(测试驱动开发)、diagnosing-bugs(六阶段 Bug 诊断)、to-prd(合成 PRD)。 当用户需要对齐需求、设计确认、写测试、修 Bug、写 PRD、会话交接时触发。 安装后需将 skills/ 子目录复制到 .agents/skills/ 或 skills/ 目录下。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: CoolingRabbit v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 423 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 22 h ago

Matt Pocock 工程方法论 Kimi 适配版 — 一键安装 6 个生产级开发 skills: grilling(需求对齐)、grill-with-docs(代码库对齐+文档维护)、handoff(跨会话交接)、 tdd(测试驱动开发)、diagnosing-bugs(六阶段 Bug…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 6 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 423 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -41 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 257: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 6 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill bundle is not malware, but it gives very broad auto-triggered workflow instructions that can write project files and publish PRD content to issue trackers without sufficiently tight activation boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 24 Jun 2026