AC canva
Manage Canva designs, assets, and folders via the Connect API. WHAT IT CAN DO: - List/search/organize designs and folders - Export finished designs (PNG/PDF/JPG) - Upload images to asset library - Autofill brand templates with data - Create blank designs (doc/presentation/whiteboard/custom) WHAT IT CANNOT DO: - Add content to designs (text, shapes, elements) - Edit existing design content - Upload documents (images only) - AI design generation Best for: asset pipelines, export automation, organization, template autofill. Triggers: /canva, "upload to canva", "export design", "list my designs", "canva folder".
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (canva) differs from the folder (canva-connect)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 11 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1319 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low The response is described with custom markup (10 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 618: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.