AC fund-flow
资金流向分析工具 v1.1.0。分析股票/板块的主力资金净流入排行、 散户资金对比、净额排序。支持资金趋势检测(3/5/10日)、 板块聚合分析、多时间维度(日/周/月)、与指数对比、强度评分。 Use when: 需要分析资金流向趋势、 查看主力资金动向、板块资金对比、资金强度评分。 🎉 v1.1.0 新增: - --trend: 资金趋势检测(3/5/10日方向 + 持续性) - --sector: 板块聚合分析(按板块汇总资金) - --timeframe: 多时间维度(day/week/month/year) - --compare: 与指数/大盘对比(跑赢/跑输) - 资金强度评分(主力占比、持续性、背离度) - --chart: ASCII趋势图 - 主力流入占比指标 触发关键词：资金流向、主力资金、板块排行、股票分析、资金趋势 适用范围：CSV 资金流向数据(日频) 运行模式：纯本地
资金流向分析工具 v1.1.0。分析股票/板块的主力资金净流入排行、 散户资金对比、净额排序。支持资金趋势检测(3/5/10日)、 板块聚合分析、多时间维度(日/周/月)、与指数对比、强度评分。 Use when: 需要分析资金流向趋势、 查看主力资金动向、板块资金对比、资金强度评分。 🎉 v1.1.0 新增…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 7 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 502 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 408: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.