SKILLEMALL.ai

AC ci-failure-fixer

Monitor GitHub Actions CI pipelines for failures and automatically fix common issues. Use when asked to watch CI, fix build failures, monitor GitHub Actions, set up CI auto-repair, or diagnose failed builds. Detects failures via `gh` CLI, reads build logs, matches against known fix patterns (dependency issues, snapshot mismatches, lint errors, E2E failures), applies fixes automatically, and reports unfixable issues with diagnosis. Works as a cron job or on-demand. Requires `gh` CLI authenticated with GitHub.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: DanielGrobelny v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files · 1 script body ≈ 527 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 50/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
50/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 50/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 527 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 513: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill openly aims to repair CI failures, but it can drive recurring automated repository changes and pushes using the user's GitHub access without enough scoping or review controls.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026