SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BC engram

Persistent semantic memory layer for AI agents. Local-first storage (SQLite+LanceDB) with Ollama embeddings. Store and recall facts, decisions, preferences, events, relationships across sessions. Supports memory decay, deduplication, typed memories (5 types), memory relationships (7 graph relation types), agent/user scoping, semantic search, context-aware recall, auto-extraction from text (rules/LLM/hybrid), import/export, REST API, MCP protocol. Solves context window and compaction amnesia. Server at localhost:3400, dashboard at /dashboard. Install via npm (engram-memory), requires Ollama with nomic-embed-text model.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Dannydvm v0.2.1 2 files body ≈ 1 555 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 21 h ago

Persistent semantic memory layer for AI agents.

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requires"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "install"

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1555 tokens
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 625: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent local memory tool, but it encourages persistent storage of credentials and broad conversation ingestion without enough safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026