SKILLEMALL.ai

BC project-site-selection-analysis

围绕项目落地需求与目标区域承载条件,综合评估项目与区域在土地空间、产业基础、政策支持、 交通物流、人才供给、配套服务、成本条件及风险约束等方面的匹配度,形成系统化的项目选址 分析报告。本技能核心解决"项目适不适合落在目标区域、为什么适合或不适合、落地优势和短板 是什么、需要哪些承接条件、是否具备招商落地可行性"等核心问题。本技能不是简单判断某个区域 "好不好",而是围绕具体项目需求,分析区域是否具备承接该项目的现实条件、产业协同能力和 长期发展空间。当用户需要分析某项目是否适合落地某区域、评估项目选址可行性、对比多个区域 的项目承接能力、研究某产业项目落地条件、判断项目与园区/城市/区县的匹配度、为招商项目 提供落地研判、为企业投资扩产选择区域、分析项目落地风险和承接短板时,激活此技能。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: 撼地数科 v1.0.3 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 635 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 23 h ago

围绕项目落地需求与目标区域承载条件,综合评估项目与区域在土地空间、产业基础、政策支持、 交通物流、人才供给、配套服务、成本条件及风险约束等方面的匹配度,形成系统化的项目选址 分析报告。本技能核心解决"项目适不适合落在目标区域、为什么适合或不适合、落地优势和短板…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerLogistics and warehousetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "parameters"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "tools"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 217 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1635 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 348: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 67 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 217 items
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed project site-selection report generator with no executable code or hidden high-risk behavior found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 14 Jul 2026