SKILLEMALL.ai

BC http-request-builder

Build and test HTTP requests with CLI interface: headers, auth, body, cookies, with history and templates.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Derick v1.0.0 4 files body ≈ 1 354 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token README.md:32
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      --auth bearer --token "eyJh…CJ9"
      quoted
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:61
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      --auth bearer --token "eyJh…CJ9"
      quoted

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Build and test HTTP requests with CLI interface: headers, auth, bo… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 49 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1354 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 106: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a legitimate HTTP testing tool, but it can store tokens, headers, and request bodies in plaintext local files without strong warning or redaction.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026