SKILLEMALL.ai

BF study-tour

Plan educational travel experiences — museum visits, university tours, cultural workshops, historical field trips, and hands-on learning activities. Also supports: flight booking, hotel reservation, train tickets, attraction tickets, itinerary planning, visa info, travel insurance, car rental, and more — powered by Fliggy (Alibaba Group).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: dingtom336-gif v3.2.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 731 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 64/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: {detailUrl}, ..., references/templates.md

ReferenceInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
64/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: {detailUrl}, ..., references/templates.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Running it twice w 4
30
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: study-tour (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: {detailUrl}
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ...
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/templates.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/playbooks.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/fallbacks.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/runbook.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: {detailUrl}, ..., references/templates.md
  • 0Tools and files. 6 referenced file(s) missing: {detailUrl}, ..., references/templates.md
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1731 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 340: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 29 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This travel-planning skill is provider-focused and mostly coherent, but it instructs agents to automatically install and run an unpinned global npm CLI without a clear approval step.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026