BF huawei-cloud-business-tf-support
Queries Huawei Cloud billing and fee details only when Terraform needs a billing or pricing inquiry. Covers balances, bills, coupons, cash coupons, stored-value cards, orders, refunds, costs, free resources, resource usage, enterprise accounts, and on-demand/period/ELB/NAT/DCS pricing. No write operations. Use this skill only when Terraform requires billing details, invoice/bill summaries, coupon or balance status, refund/order billing status, or pricing inquiry. Triggers: Terraform 账单查询, Terraform 费用查询, Terraform 价格询价, Terraform 询价, Terraform billing query, Terraform pricing inquiry, Terraform price quote, Terraform bill summary.
Queries Huawei Cloud billing and fee details only when Terraform needs a billing or pricing inquiry.
As a process F 55/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 2
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:76Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-execpolicy-bypassSKILL.md:107Runs PowerShell with execution policy bypassed (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- Windows: `skill action=exec: powershell -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File skill://scripts/chec…ps1`
quoted
Files scanned: 54. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/<service_category>/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/<service>/guide.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/<service_category>/, scripts/as/list_scaling_groups.py, references/<service>/guide.md
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Steps. 68 steps, 6 vague phrases
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2385 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (15 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 638: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.