SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC api-tester

REST API testing and validation toolkit. Send requests, validate responses, benchmark performance, generate HTML reports. Use when the user wants to: (1) Test a REST API endpoint, (2) Validate API responses against expectations, (3) Benchmark API endpoint performance, (4) Test all endpoints from an OpenAPI/Swagger spec, (5) Generate API test reports, (6) Debug HTTP responses including status codes, headers, and bodies.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ericlooi504 v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 753 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, consistency

IntegrationData and analyticsSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (api-tester) differs from the folder (rest-api-test-cli)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 4 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 753 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 422: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 8 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 4 items
    • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a straightforward REST API testing skill, with expected network requests and optional local reports, but users should handle tokens and report files carefully.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026