SKILLEMALL.ai

AB sql-db-toolkit

Comprehensive SQL database toolkit for querying, schema inspection, data export, and migration management. Use when the user wants to: (1) Query a database with SELECT/INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, (2) Inspect table schemas, indexes, and foreign keys, (3) Export data to CSV/JSON, (4) Generate SQL migrations or schema diffs, (5) Run database backups and restore, (6) Analyze query performance with EXPLAIN, (7) Work with SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL, or any sqlalchemy-compatible database.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ericlooi504 v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 482 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, failures and branches, progress reporting

IntegrationPostgreSQLMySQLInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
68/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Comprehensive SQL database toolkit for querying, schema inspection… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 5 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 482 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 479: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This appears to be a legitimate SQL toolkit, but it needs Review because it can modify databases and can print password-bearing connection strings without enough safeguards.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026