SKILLEMALL.ai

AC jarvis-browser-setup

Setup Jarvis Browser Control System for new users. Generates unique WebSocket auth token, configures server, and prepares extension files. Use when user wants to share the browser control system with others or setup a new instance. Fully automated - no manual steps required, OpenClaw handles everything.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: evernation v1.0.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 377 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, failures and branches, running it twice

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 2

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 2
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token README.md:45
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)
      XsJ3…usZ+WSPr0Ca!ExnV…6Nv
    • low Secrets in code secret-high-entropy-token SKILL.md:61
      High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      - Example: `XsJ3…usZ+WSPr0Ca!ExnV…6Nv`
      quoted

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 377 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 304: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is for browser-control setup, but it handles a powerful control token and unreviewed local server/extension code with weak disclosure and scoping.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026