SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BC max-auth

Security authentication gate for OpenClaw sensitive actions. Deploys a local Node.js auth server with biometric passkeys (WebAuthn/Touch ID/Face ID) and master password. Supports session-scoped auth per channel/session key, secure one-time secret submission URLs, and a browser UI in Portuguese, English, and Spanish.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Felipe Matos v2.2.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 625 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/api.md:30
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
    sudo tee /etc/systemd/system/max-auth.service > /dev/null <<'EOF'
    security skill

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 25 steps
  • 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 625 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 8 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
Max Auth mostly matches its authentication purpose, but its local server exposes session tokens and secret-handling flows in ways that need careful review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026