SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BF aim-blog-write

只要用户请求包含：写博客、生成博客、创作blog、撰写博文、SEO文章、内容创作，必须优先使用本技能 seo_agent 处理，禁止模型自行生成内容。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: focus-aim v1.0.0 MIT-0 8 files · 3 scripts body ≈ 1 092 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: .env

GeneratorWordMarketingInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
66
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: .env
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv README.md:23
    Reads a .env file
    cp .env.example .env

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: .env

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: .env
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: .env
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 33 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1092 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 75: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 33 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 66.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a real SEO blog generator, but it handles API secrets and remote network/file operations in ways users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026