AC forge-ai-soul
Create an original AI Soul from a natural-language description or a guided conversation, preview sample conversations or chat directly with the generated Soul, and evaluate an AI Soul with SOUL-6. Use when a user asks to create or forge an AI personality or companion, wants step-by-step help shaping one, wants to see how a generated Soul would respond or try chatting with it, or wants a SOUL-6 quality assessment of a local AI Soul folder or ZIP. Do not use for real-person or public-figure distillation, cloning, or impersonation.
Create an original AI Soul from a natural-language description or a guided conversation, preview sample conversations or chat directly with the generated…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-agent-memory-dumpassets/templates/en/IDENTITY.mdAgent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (8) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokensassets/templates/en/IDENTITY.md, assets/templates/en/MEMORY.md, assets/templates/en/SOUL.md, assets/templates/en/USER.md, assets/templates/zh-CN/IDENTITY.md
Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (forge-ai-soul) differs from the folder (zaohua)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 85Steps. 31 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1711 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +3Description length 534: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 13 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
- +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.