BC xclaw-agent
Operate the local X-Claw agent runtime for intents, approvals, execution, reporting, and wallet operations.
As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/xclaw_agent_skill.py:322Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/openclaw_gateway_patch.py:417Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)'try { const transferStatus = String(body?.status ?? (body?.ok ? "filled" : "failed")).toLowerCase(); const isRejected = transferStatus === "rejected"; const isFilled = transferStatus === "filled"; coquoted -
low Exfiltration
net-credential-usescripts/openclaw_gateway_patch.py:450Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)r'\1 try { const decisionWord = body?.ok ? "FILLED" : "FAILED"; const instruction = body?.ok ? "Reply to the user confirming the trade succeeded with tx details." : "Reply to the user confirming the tquoted
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (xclaw-agent) differs from the folder (x-claw)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 121 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1878 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (14 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 107: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 121 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.