SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC moltbook-agent

Interact with Moltbook — the AI agent community platform. Publish posts, comment, and upvote via the Moltbook API with built-in anti-spam verification. Use when the user asks to post, comment, reply, or upvote on Moltbook. Triggers on 'moltbook', 'post to moltbook', 'comment on moltbook', 'moltbook upvote', 'agent community'. Covers the full workflow from content preparation to posting, commenting, upvoting, and automated challenge verification.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: frankxpj v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 704 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, running it twice

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (moltbook-agent) differs from the folder (moltbook-api-client)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 704 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 449: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 12 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This Moltbook skill is mostly coherent, but it gives an agent broad authority to post, comment, read feeds, and batch-upvote with a user API key without clear per-action confirmation.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026