AD amazon-product-improvement
亚马逊产品改进建议 Skill：把评论抱怨转成可执行的产品迭代清单， 按影响人数与严重度排优先级，区分改模具、换材质、改包装、补说明书等不同代价的动作， 供下一批次开发参考。Use when the user asks about product improvement, iteration priorities, quality issues from reviews, 产品改进、产品迭代、优化方向、 质量改善、开发需求、改款建议。Requires an ARI API key (ari_live_*).
亚马逊产品改进建议 Skill：把评论抱怨转成可执行的产品迭代清单， 按影响人数与严重度排优先级，区分改模具、换材质、改包装、补说明书等不同代价的动作， 供下一批次开发参考。Use when the user asks about product improvement, iteration priorities…
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/ari.py:61Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 6 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (amazon-product-improvement) differs from the folder (product-improve)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 69 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2366 tokens
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 256: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 69 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.