SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

BF trading-agents

基于 AgentScope 的多智能体股票诊断系统。一键执行完整诊断流程，自动生成技术面、基本面、舆情面分析、研究员辩论、交易员决策、风控讨论及最终投资决策报告。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ganyu21 v1.0.7 MIT-0 20 files body ≈ 2 252 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: BACKGROUND_RULES.md

ReferenceAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
64
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: BACKGROUND_RULES.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process SKILL.md:146
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    nohup python3 scripts/stock_advisor.py --stock 600519.SH > diagnose.log 2>&1 &

Files scanned: 20. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: BACKGROUND_RULES.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: BACKGROUND_RULES.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: BACKGROUND_RULES.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 38 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2252 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 81: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -217 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 37 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 38 items
  • +4Has examples (23 code blocks)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a coherent stock-analysis skill, but it needs review because it sends full analysis context to external services, can print model reasoning into logs, and may install a Python package during normal use.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026