AC gingiris-b2b-growth
🇺🇸 B2B SaaS Growth — PLG vs SLG Playbook — Diagnose whether your problem is distribution, pricing, or PMF. PLG/SLG selection by ACV and sales cycle, the 5-stage path from $0 to $10M ARR, NRR discipline, affiliate & channel motion, enterprise tiering. Built from HeyGen, Deel, Vercel, Supabase, Snowflake patterns. 🇨🇳 B2B SaaS 增长 — PLG vs SLG 决策手册 — 诊断你的瓶颈是分发、定价还是 PMF。按 ACV 和销售周期选 PLG/SLG，$0 → $10M ARR 的 5 阶段路径，NRR 纪律，联盟与渠道打法，Enterprise 分层。提炼自 HeyGen、Deel、Vercel、Supabase、Snowflake。 🇯🇵 B2B SaaS グロース — PLG vs SLG プレイブック — 課題が流通・価格・PMFのどれかを診断。ACVとセールスサイクルでPLG/SLG選定、$0→$10M ARRの5段階パス、NRR規律、アフィリエイト＆チャネル。 🇰🇷 B2B SaaS 성장 — PLG vs SLG 플레이북 — 병목이 유통·가격·PMF 중 무엇인지 진단. ACV와 세일즈 사이클로 PLG/SLG 선택, $0 → $10M ARR 5단계 경로, NRR 규율, 제휴 & 채널. Triggers: "B2B growth" | "B2B SaaS" | "PLG" | "SLG" | "product-led growth" | "sales-led growth" | "PLG or SLG" | "SaaS pricing" | "ARR growth" | "NRR" | "go to market" | "enterprise sales" | "affiliate" | "PMF" | "B2B 增长" | "PLG 还是 SLG" | "SaaS 定价" | "渠道合作" | "PLG/SLG 선택"
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 85Steps. 75 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3376 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 1013: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 14 example trigger phrases
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 75 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.