SKILLEMALL.ai

AC gingiris-geo-audit

🇺🇸 GEO Audit — AI Search Visibility Checker for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude & Gemini. 29-point GEO readiness checklist: robots.txt AI crawler access, IndexNow configuration, Schema.org markup validation, content citability scoring, FAQ structure analysis, and AI-friendly content patterns. Get a prioritized fix list to improve AI citation rates. 🇨🇳 GEO 审计工具 — AI 搜索可见性检查器。29 项 GEO 就绪度检查:robots.txt AI 爬虫开放、IndexNow 配置、Schema.org 验证、内容可引用性评分、FAQ 结构分析。输出优先级修复清单。 🇯🇵 GEO監査 — AI検索可視性チェッカー。29項目のGEOレディネスチェック:robots.txt AI クローラーアクセス、IndexNow設定、Schema.org検証、コンテンツ引用可能性スコア、FAQ構造分析。 🇰🇷 GEO 감사 — AI 검색 가시성 체커. 29개 GEO 준비도 점검: robots.txt AI 크롤러 접근, IndexNow 설정, Schema.org 검증, 콘텐츠 인용 가능성 점수, FAQ 구조 분석. Triggers: "GEO audit" | "AI search visibility" | "AI citation" | "Perplexity visibility" | "ChatGPT citation" | "AI crawler" | "IndexNow audit" | "Schema.org check" | "AI-friendly content" | "GEO readiness" | "AI 搜索审计" | "AI 可见性" | "GEO 检查"

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Iris Wei v1.0.1 MIT-0 1 file body ≈ 1 147 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerCustomer supportResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1147 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 945: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 13 example trigger phrases
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a markdown-only website audit checklist skill with disclosed, purpose-aligned behavior and no executable code or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · 3 Jun 2026