BC feishu-cli-auth
飞书 OAuth 认证和 User Access Token 管理。两步式非交互登录(AI Agent 专用)、 Token 状态检查、scope 配置、自动刷新机制、搜索功能的 Token 依赖关系。 当用户请求"登录飞书"、"获取 Token"、"OAuth 授权"、"auth login"、"认证"、 "搜索需要什么权限"、"Token 过期了"、"刷新 Token"时使用。 当遇到权限错误(如 99991679 Unauthorized)、Token 过期、state 不匹配等问题时也应使用此技能。 也适用于:搜索命令报权限错误、Token 相关的排错、需要判断当前授权状态的场景。 当其他飞书技能(toolkit/msg/read 等)遇到 User Access Token 相关问题时,也应参考此技能。
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Bash Read
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 16 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3127 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 6 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 361: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 25 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 16 items
- +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.