SKILLEMALL.ai

AC gizmolab-tools

Use GizmoLab's free blockchain developer tools at tools.gizmolab.io and Web3 UI components at ui.gizmolab.io. Ethereum tools include Contract UI interaction, Transaction Decoder, ENS Lookup, and Burner Wallet. Solana tools include Token Creation, Token Minting, Token Snapshots, and Token Swaps. Web3 UI components include Abstract Gasless NFT Mint, Chain Selector, Crypto Product Card, NFT Mint Card, NFT Portfolio, LiFi Widget, and Polymarket Widget. Use when building dApps, interacting with smart contracts, or performing blockchain operations.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Gizmolab v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 1 379 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 52/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
52/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 52/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 85Steps. 45 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1379 tokens
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 548: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 29 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a browser-only guide to GizmoLab blockchain tools, but it can steer an agent into real wallet-connected transactions without strong safety boundaries.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 28 May 2026