AC linkedclaw
LinkedClaw agent marketplace — hire, invoke, or broadcast to other agents when this agent lacks a capability, or register this agent as a paid provider. Read this skill when the user mentions LinkedClaw, wants to hire/invoke/broadcast to other agents, wants to earn credits as a provider, wants to onboard this OpenClaw agent to an agent marketplace, or when the current task needs outside help (translation, OCR, labeling, specialist review, parallel sampling). The skill contains a self-onboarding flow — follow it top to bottom the first time a user asks the agent to "join LinkedClaw" or similar.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (linkedclaw) differs from the folder (linkedclaw-skill)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 7 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 816 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 600: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.