SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AC kcard

Knowledge Card generator. Extracts key knowledge from user-provided material (text, files, URLs), determines optimal card type (concept/memo/process/comparison), applies cognitive science principles (chunking, dual coding, elaboration), outputs structured Markdown, and renders it into a beautiful image. Use when user says "知识卡片", "kcard", "make a card", "knowledge card", or wants to turn notes/articles into memorable visual cards.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Jay v1.6.5 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 611 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process C 61/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructureWriting and documentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
100/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
99
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
61/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 61/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 611 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 2 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 434: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 99.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This card-generation skill is mostly aligned with its purpose, but it needs review because it reads user material, runs a browser-based renderer, saves outputs locally, and contains an undisclosed third-party font request.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026