SKILLEMALL.ai

AD github-pages-publish

把「已有的」静态网页文件(单个 HTML 或整个网站目录)安全发布到 GitHub Pages,生成可公开访问、能分享的网址链接。当用户已有现成网页,想「发到网上」「部署上线」「发布网页」「生成分享链接」时使用;本技能只做「发布已有文件」,不负责从零生成网站。提供可执行的 deploy.py 脚本(整站增量上传 / 单文件上传 / 仅启用 Pages 三种模式),纯标准库无额外依赖,逐文件增量上传、绝不覆盖远程已有内容,并已回写真实踩坑(token 写权限、连接器只读、force 覆盖风险)。仅适用于纯静态内容;涉及后端、数据库、登录或敏感数据时不要用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: gypalyson-creator v0.1.0 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 967 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

把「已有的」静态网页文件(单个 HTML 或整个网站目录)安全发布到 GitHub Pages,生成可公开访问、能分享的网址链接。当用户已有现成网页,想「发到网上」「部署上线」「发布网页」「生成分享链接」时使用;本技能只做「发布已有文件」,不负责从零生成网站。提供可执行的 deploy.py 脚本(整站增量上传 /…

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureGitHubInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 11 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 37 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 967 tokens
  • low The response is described with custom markup (12 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 280: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is purpose-aligned for publishing static sites, but it uses GitHub write access to create public pages and overstates that it will never overwrite existing remote content.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 17 Aug 2026