BC MigraQ
腾讯云迁移平台(CMG/MSP)全流程能力。触发词:资源扫描、扫描阿里云/AWS/华为云/GCP资源、生成云资源清单、选型推荐、对标腾讯云、推荐规格、帮我推荐、给我推荐、ECS对应什么腾讯云产品、成本分析、TCO、迁移报价、询价、价格计算器、cmg-scan、cmg-recommend、cmg-tco
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.
Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 7
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 7
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Write Bash Grep
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:174Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_ID="your-secret-id"' >> ~/.zshrc
-
medium Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcSKILL.md:175Writes to a shell startup fileecho 'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_KEY="your-secret-key"' >> ~/.zshrc
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/check_env.py:418Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)log_info(' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_ID="your-secret-id"\' >> ~/.zshrc')code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/check_env.py:419Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)log_info(' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_KEY="your-secret-key"\' >> ~/.zshrc')code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/migrateq_sse_api.py:186Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_ID="your-secret-id"\' >> ~/.zshrc\n'
code literal -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-shell-rcscripts/migrateq_sse_api.py:187Writes to a shell startup file (string literal in code, not executed)' echo \'export TENCENTCLOUD_SECRET_KEY="your-secret-key"\' >> ~/.zshrc\n'
code literal
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
name-formatname should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens) - warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_zh" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "description_en"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1252 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 151: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
- +3All 2 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.