AC brain-cms
Continuum Memory System (CMS) for OpenClaw agents. Replaces flat MEMORY.md with a brain-inspired multi-layer memory architecture — semantic schemas, a hippocampal router (INDEX.md), vector store (LanceDB + nomic-embed-text), and automated NREM/REM sleep cycles for consolidation. Based on neuroscience research (LTP, spreading activation, CMS theory). Use when setting up persistent agent memory, improving context efficiency, or reducing token cost on long-running agents. Triggers: brain, memory system, CMS, long-term memory, vector store, sleep cycle, NREM, REM, memory architecture, semantic memory, context efficiency.
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Continuum Memory System (CMS) for OpenClaw agents. Replaces flat M… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 7 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 754 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 624: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 7 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.