SKILLEMALL.ai
RU Sign in

AB logistics

Query and explain parcel logistics across courier providers, including tracking, courier identification, multi-package lookup, status interpretation, and delivery-update guidance. Use when the user asks about package tracking, logistics tracking, tracking numbers, identifying courier companies, batch logistics queries, or wants help understanding shipment progress across one or more couriers.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: haidong v1.0.2 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 210 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

ProcedureLogistics and warehousetype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Failures and branches. 2 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 210 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 395: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 3 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This package-tracking skill needs review because its visible implementation returns mock tracking updates as if they were real and stores tracking numbers locally without clear disclosure.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: benign · 14 May 2026